<%@LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT" CODEPAGE="1252"%> EIAss.com,Job Destruction 1886,* Bogus Cisco job ad is bad timing for Fragomen law firm *,

In a message dated 7/8/08 4:48:41 A.M. Central Daylight Time, News@JobDestruction.info writes:

<<<<< JOB DESTRUCTION NEWSLETTER No. 1886 -- 7/08/2008 >>>>>

As we all know, employers run bogus job ads so that they can legally reject
all qualified Americans who apply. It's all part of the labor certification
game that is designed to give employers everything they need to
discriminate against higher priced U.S. workers.

It's been business-as-usual in the cheap labor business until an engineer
named David Huber applied for a network engineer position at Cisco Systems
in response to a job advertisement in the Chicago Tribune newspaper. Cisco
never intended on hiring a U.S. citizen so they sent all resumes to an
employee of Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy LLP. The problem for Cisco
and Fragomen is that they bungled the job ad because it included the
employee's name. Big, big, mistake!

To see the job ad and to understand why it's causing such a stir, go to
this web page:

http://www.jobdestruction.info/ShameH1B/Library/Archives/FragomenCiscoJobAd.
htm

To read more detail on how Huber stumbled onto this fine piece of evidence,
read this excellent and revealing blog:

http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29473
Brad Reese on Cisco

The discovery of Cisco's bogus job ad came at a very bad time for Fragomen.
That's because the Department of Labor is doing an investigation to see if
the Fragomen firm has been giving employers a little too much coaching on
how to rig the green card program. The DOL intends to do an audit of all of
the green card applications for the Fragomen law firm and that has made
many immigration lawyers very angry, and worried. Unscrupulous immigration
lawyer-sharks are worried that if the DOL finds something wrong at Fragomen
their own law firm may be next. It's a common concern among criminal
conspirators.

Fragomen has another big problem: the job ad was saved so they can't deny
their culpability. Their first response was to send an edgy letter to the
ad agency who posted the ad. Go here to see the letter:

http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/news/2008,0707-fragomen.pdf

It's a nice try by Fragomen but nobody is going to buy it. The Miller Ad
agency was just paid to do what they were told, although they probably
goofed big time by revealing the Fragomen contact in the job ad. Fragomen
blows the problem off on a technical error. It was very bad luck on
Fragomen's part that Huber figured out the sham:

While it is unlikely that a reader would identify Fragomen
as the point of contact, ... blah, blah, blah ...
the firm's Fragomen name does show up in the posting
(albeit with no address, email, phone number or method of
contacting Fragomen, as well as an incomplete version of
the firm's name.

Yes, they are right: it is highly unlikely that someone would figure out
their scam, but David Huber did. Bummer for Fragomen!

The Immigration Lawyers Website ILW is trying to cover for their fellow
conspirators by resorting to some very cheap character assassination. In
the article below they begin by accusing Huber of being a xenophobe. I have
talked to Huber several times and he never seemed like an opponent of
immigration. He is however opposed to discrimination against American
citizens, and is very angry that he has lost jobs to H-1Bs that are usually
not as qualified as he. ILW spinners try to make a big deal about the fact
that he testified in Congress against the job destruction caused by H-1B.
You can read it yourself but you won't find any of the anti-immigrant
sentiment that ILW is so paranoid about:

http://judiciary.house.gov/OversightTestimony.aspx?ID=591
Testimony Before the House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on
Immigration, Border Security and Claims
By David Huber, March 30, 2006

The most hilarious part of the article below is that after ILW takes a few
swipes at Huber they cop a guilty plea. They admit to everything but try to
absolve themselves of guilt by saying that Megan Clarke, who was listed on
the job ad, was just a temporary employee of Fragomen. It's a nice try but
doesn't change the facts -- and the facts are very damning -- especially
now that the job ad is all over the web.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/news/2008,0707-fragomen.shtm

Fragomen Statement And Letter From Ad Agency

Letter from Miller Advertising Agency

FRAGOMEN STATEMENT CONCERNING DAVID HUBER'S ALLEGATIONS

David Huber is a committed opponent of immigration. A year before he ever
responded to the advertisement in question, he testified in Congress
against permitting foreign workers in the U.S.

These are the accurate facts concerning the ad he has publicly described
having responded to:

-- The ad Mr. Huber responded to directed him to send his resume to the
employer at the employer's street address. It did not refer to Fragomen or
direct resumes to Fragomen.

-- The name "M.E. Clarke" -- who is a Fragomen employee -- was used
temporarily by the employer's mailroom to identify a mailstop at the
employer's request. There was no indication in the ad of any connection
between M.E. Clarke and Fragomen.

-- M.E. Clarke provided clerical support to the employer's H.R. function,
including collecting resumes to ensure that they would be properly and
promptly distributed to the appropriate hiring managers for evaluation.

-- Neither M.E. Clarke nor any other Fragomen employee reviewed or
evaluated the resumes received to assess the applicants' credentials.

-- No interview was conducted by any Fragomen employee.

-- No hiring decision was made by any Fragomen employee.

-- Mr. Huber's resume was evaluated solely by the employer, and the
employer determined Mr. Huber was not qualified for the job.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Newsletter Homepage:
http://www.JobDestruction.com/shameh1b/JobDestructionNews.htm

Support this Newsletter and www.JobDestruction.com by donating:
www.zazona.com/Donations.htm

To Be removed from this mailing list, reply to this
email with UNSUbSCRIBE in the subject window
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -