In a message dated 1/5/09 5:54:33 P.M. Central Standard Time, News@JobDestruction.info writes:
<<<<< JOB DESTRUCTION NEWSLETTER No. 1952 -- 1/05/2009 >>>>>
I have been in a gloomy mood since the first of the year, but a recent
editorial on the Immigration Law Website (ILW) really raised my spirits.
ILW's bad attitude about H-1B and amnesty in 2009 is very encouraging,
although their negativity is probably not justified.
Considering the current political scene it's difficult to see why ILW is so
dour: president elect Obama and all his cabinet support H-1B and amnesty,
and Congress is stacked with a majority of Democrats in Congress who are
anxious to pass H-1B increases and to shove the immigration issue under the
rug by passing amnesty. The only lip service they give on controlling the
alien invasion is to spend more resources on border enforcement.
Read the ILW commentary closely and you will discover the source of their
angst: YOU! That's right, you have been raising a stink about H-1B and
that's what worries ILW -- they recognize that Congress listened to you.
ILW understands that raising H-1B caps will become increasingly difficult
as unemployment continues to get worse.
The new Congress is likely to be more unfriendly on H1Bs than any
post-IMMACT Congress. This is true for several reasons - firstly,
H1Bs have been the single most criticized part of employment
immigration in the last decade;
Well folks, let's keep the stink going because 2009 is going to be a rough
ride. It would be very surprising if there wasn't a major push to raise the
H-1B cap soon after Obama becomes president. Hopefully by the end of the
year ILW will have even more to complain about. LOL!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/digest/2008,1229.shtm#comment
CIR And H1Bs
The New Year will begin with Democrats dominating the Hill in numbers last
seen several decades ago. Furthermore, with Dixiecrats no longer the power
they were in the 1960s and 1970s, the Democratic caucus tilts evermore to
the left. We examine below two implications of this new left wing
ascendancy on immigration matters in the 111th Congress.
CIR Redefined:
Comprehensive Immigration Reform as formulated for almost a decade, and as
delineated in McCain-Kennedy and Kennedy-Kyl, has three parts:
Legalization, Enforcement, Increased legal channels. Lets see what each of
these meant and how that meaning will change in the 111th Congress.
Legalization includes some way to bring into legal status the vast majority
of the undocumented population, frequently in mixed-status families (with
undocumented, LPRs and USCs), it also includes DREAM. This part of CIR
remains unchanged in the new Congress. Enforcement includes massive border
expenditure, massively increased enforcement in the interior especially
against errant employers and an employment card (a de facto national ID
card). This part of CIR remains largely unchanged, however there will be
less emphasis on border security and more emphasis on anti-employer
measures. Increased legal channels has two sub parts - increased permanent
immigration quotas for both family-based and employment-based (particularly
large increases for employment-based) and increased temporary
employment-based immigration quotas for both skilled and unskilled workers
(massive numbers for the unskilled). This part of CIR will be changed
almost beyond recognition. Increases in permanent numbers will likely be
postponed for the distant future, those legalized may have to wait for a
decade or two before naturalizing. This will have the unintended effect of
exacerbating the waiting times for employment-based immigration from India,
China, Mexico and Phillipines, with EB3 for India and China becoming
essentially extinct until Congress returns to this issue. The biggest
change will likely be in temporary employment-based immigration. Gone is
the hope for increased H1B numbers, gone also is the idea that CIR will
address the single-most dysfunctional part of our immigration system - a
lack of legal channels for unskilled workers. The original draft of
McCain-Kennedy made provisions for 400,000 temporary unskilled visas per
year, the Senate cut it in half before passing McCain-Kennedy to the House
which refused to even discuss it. The left-wing 111th Congress is unlikely
to make any provisions at all for temporary employment numbers, especially
in the midst of a severe economic recession. One exception will be that CIR
will still include AgJOBS, which will likely be the only sop to increased
legal channels once promised under the CIR banner.
Impact on H1Bs:
The new Congress is likely to be more unfriendly on H1Bs than any
post-IMMACT Congress. This is true for several reasons - firstly, H1Bs have
been the single most criticized part of employment immigration in the last
decade; secondly, in the middle of a severe economic recession, cutting H1B
numbers, or even suspending or eliminating the H1B program, may be a way
for Congress to deflect criticism for legalization (by implying that
legalizing helps US workers in the unionized sector, and cutting the H1B
program helps US workers in the tech and skilled sectors); thirdly,
Congress can easily do all the above without in any way endangering those
in H1B status currently in the US, since Congressional action would likely
be directed against future H1B flows. In fact, Congress might well free the
current H1B workers from their employers by legislating unlimited
portability at the H1B stage without requiring a new petition to USCIS.
This point is particularly important since success for CIR might well hinge
on the active assistance of the Immigrationvoice.org community which would
benefit from such portability. ImmigrationVoice is the only pro-immigration
lobby with a record of success in sending faxes/calls to Congress in
numbers even remotely approaching the anti-immigration side. In the larger
view of all immigration benefits, asking employers in the middle of a
severe recession to do without new H1Bs for a couple of years is a small
price to pay for legalizing millions of the undocumented. In any event, we
believe that those hoping for increased H1B numbers from the 111th Congress
will be disappointed.
With Democrats controlling 58% of the membership in the new Senate and 59%
in the new House, immigration politics are about to be changed to a great
degree. Stay tuned to Immigration Daily for the latest.
We welcome readers to share their opinion and ideas with us by writing to
editor@ilw.com.
Publisher: Sam Udani Legal Editor: Michele Kim
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Newsletter Homepage:
http://www.JobDestruction.com/shameh1b/JobDestructionNews.htm
Support this Newsletter and www.JobDestruction.com by donating:
www.zazona.com/Donations.htm
To Be removed from this mailing list, reply to this
email with UNSUbSCRIBE in the subject window
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -